A framework for leveraging network course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) faculty to develop, validate, and administer an assessment instrument.

Over the last several years, nationally disseminated course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have emerged as an alternative to developing a novel CURE from scratch, but objective assessment of these multi-institution (network) CUREs across institutions is challenging due to differences in student populations, instructors, and fidelity of implementation. The time, money, and skills required to develop and validate a CURE-specific assessment instrument can be prohibitive. Here, we describe a co-design process for assessing a network CURE [the Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance in the Environment (PARE)] that did not require support through external funding, was a relatively low time commitment for participating instructors, and resulted in a validated instrument that is usable across diverse PARE network institution types and implementation styles. Data collection efforts have involved over two dozen unique institutions, 42 course offerings, and over 1,300 pre-/post-matched assessment record data points. We demonstrated significant student learning gains but with small effect size in both content and science process skills after participation in the two laboratory sessions associated with the core PARE module. These results show promise for the efficacy of short-duration CUREs, an educational research area ripe for further investigation, and may support efforts to lower barriers for instructor adoption by leveraging a CURE network for developing and validating assessment tools.

DRD4 Allele Frequency as a Lab Exercise in Neuroscience and Genetics Courses.

DNA segments with variable number tandem repeats (VNTR) serve as a model for students to learn DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques in biology laboratory courses from the high school to the graduate level. Because of a growing interest in the neurosciences among undergraduates, we have developed a PCR exercise with a focus on the nervous system and behavior, with the aim of inspiring students from all aspects of the neurosciences to appreciate the central dogma and neurogenetics. DRD4 was a good candidate to provide a lab exercise that would be more engaging than VNTR analysis of a non-coding segment. DRD4 encodes for the dopamine D4 receptor and has been controversially associated with 'novelty seeking' or 'wanderlust' behavior. DRD4 has three common variants of the 48 bp sequence on exon 3, easily differentiated through gel electrophoresis. The 2 repeat (2R), 4 repeat (4R) and 7 repeat (7R) of the 48 bp sequence are the most common alleles. The 7R sequences result in the expressed dopamine D4 receptor having less affinity for dopamine binding, which was proposed to be the reason individuals engage in 'novelty seeking' behavior, to increase dopamine release to facilitate more binding to the receptor. Here we demonstrate an enjoyable and simple two lab sequence to analyze DRD4 genotypes that is appropriate for neuroscience and genetics courses.